In the weeks leading up to the Holidays, our house received about a dozen catalogs a day. Places I never heard of or knew existed. Some repeated themselves once or twice a week. I felt sorry for our mail carrier and the recycling guy. After the new year, things settled down and one Sundance catalog promoting the 2008 film festival caught my eye.
Flipping through (I always start at the back and work towards the front - odd) I noticed in one shot, they had a vintage Rolleiflex camera sitting on the table as a prop along with what looks like a Mamiya rangefinder next to it. Looking closer, I realized the model was carrying a box with reels of film on a set designed to look like a darkroom. The Rolleiflex appears on other pages in the catalog, but it is not for sale. However, they will sell you a new Seagull camera manufactured in China and a very good value for the money. There was one other page where they were selling "vintage home movie cameras" from the '50s and '60s to decorate your home theater.
I guess where I'm going with this story is I'm glad there is still a lot of interest out there for film. Walking around downtown Chicago, I always see students with their manual cameras loaded with Tri-X film out on-assignment. Friday, I was in the Cultural Center taking pictures of the Tiffany Dome and I was stopped by somebody asking about my Leica. And, as I mentioned before, I always get a reaction when I pull out my Rolleiflex especially from the younger crowd. Film seems simpler. Nostalgic maybe. Makes you think before you take the picture rather than chimping afterwards. Hopefully it will be around for a long time.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Friday, January 4, 2008
Wedding Packages
I set out this new year to streamline my wedding packages. After much thought, I actually ended up with one more package than I started out with. But I believe they are much easier to understand and they are clearly presented on my website. Five wedding packages covers all the price points, coverages, and album options without (hopefully) being too many. A future blog will deal with the various type of albums that are popular today. But for now, please check out my five wedding package offerings for 2008. Thanks, paul
Tuesday, January 1, 2008
Happy New Year
Friday, December 21, 2007
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Environmental Portraits

Our bread-and-butter is "on-location" portraits. In other words, showing people in a natural, familiar environment. Jean and I have been to more homes, parks, fields, patios, lakes, beaches, forest preserves, and country clubs than we can remember. This keeps things fun and fresh for us, but it also is a challenge because every location is unique.
Preparation is the key. If we can't scout out a location in advance, we try to arrive an hour before the scheduled shoot-time to get set up. We bring enough studio equipment with us to light up the darkest room, but we try not to use it unless we have to. Backdrops are only used as a last resort. This minimalist approach suits our style and doesn't overwhelm our customers.
It's tough to beat the look of natural light, and we try to choose locations and times to maximize it both indoors and out. Many times we'll supplement natural light with flash, and sometimes we'll go 100% flash. When we do use flash, it's hard to tell because our portraits do not look "flashy."
Our portrait sessions are relaxed and free flowing. We'll have different spots picked out depending on the size of the group, the number of subgroups, ages of the kids, weather etc. Outdoor shots are the best, and we try to make it outside even during the winter. Many great shots occur when the family is having fun in between the posed groups, and we try to capture these like a photo journalist would covering a story.
Within 1-2 weeks after the session, customers receive a keepsake proof album and a link to an online photo gallery. We also try and create a documentary slideshow of the portrait session but can't guarantee this in every case. Customers can order prints using order forms included with the proof album or via the online shopping cart. And calling it a proof album doesn't do it justice. It's really a selection of finished images that have already been digitally corrected and retouched. Check out a sample 10x13 proof portfolio here.
Why do we like on-location portraits so much? Well, first of all, we don't have a studio! But besides that, we feel that we deliver better portraits when we go to the customer's location rather than asking them to come to us. Take a look at a recent family portrait session to see if you agree
Labels:
family portraits,
on-location portraits,
portraits
Monday, December 3, 2007
Black and White Film
For the record, I like black and white film. Both the kind you can get processed at a drug store (type C41) and the traditional kind that must be processed in black and white film chemistry. Some labs still process traditional black and white film, but you are better off doing it yourself. Therein lies its biggest advantage. By developing the film myself, I have total control over the outcome.
Once the film is developed - either my me or by a c41 lab - I scan it into a computer where the film images are merged with the digital camera images I took from the same event. This is called a "digital darkroom" and it allows me to apply the latest digital enhancements to all my images. It doesn't matter whether they originally came from a film or digital camera, they get treated the same once they are on my computer.
But they don't look the same. I'm not sure why. There is a lot of film vs digital debate on the internet, but I don't want to get into that here. I use primarily digital cameras in my business, but I always try to shoot some black and white film at an event too. How much and which kind of film depends on the clients and the event. For black and white, my film images have a different look and feel than my digital images. Could be the way I process the film, could be the "handling" differences between the film and digital cameras, could be a lot of things. I like the results and I like offering it to my clients. It's something that differentiates my company from the others.
What's the downside? Time. Few activities can burn through time faster that scanning film. Ask Jean if you don't believe me. Developing and scanning film are two extra, time-consuming steps that must be done to all the film images before they even get the same point in the production as the images that came from the digital camera. These are costs that I must pass on to my clients, but I believe the results justify the added expense.
Once the film is developed - either my me or by a c41 lab - I scan it into a computer where the film images are merged with the digital camera images I took from the same event. This is called a "digital darkroom" and it allows me to apply the latest digital enhancements to all my images. It doesn't matter whether they originally came from a film or digital camera, they get treated the same once they are on my computer.
But they don't look the same. I'm not sure why. There is a lot of film vs digital debate on the internet, but I don't want to get into that here. I use primarily digital cameras in my business, but I always try to shoot some black and white film at an event too. How much and which kind of film depends on the clients and the event. For black and white, my film images have a different look and feel than my digital images. Could be the way I process the film, could be the "handling" differences between the film and digital cameras, could be a lot of things. I like the results and I like offering it to my clients. It's something that differentiates my company from the others.
What's the downside? Time. Few activities can burn through time faster that scanning film. Ask Jean if you don't believe me. Developing and scanning film are two extra, time-consuming steps that must be done to all the film images before they even get the same point in the production as the images that came from the digital camera. These are costs that I must pass on to my clients, but I believe the results justify the added expense.
Labels:
black and white,
digital darkroom,
film,
scanning
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Happy Thanksgiving
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











